• Default
  • Foliage
  • Clouds

Route of administration of Cannabinoids: Prohibitionist argues “Smoked pot not medicine”

The inhumane federal policy of blindly restricting cannabis research and prohibiting use is responsible for desperate patents and their supporters collecting 786,368 signatures of registered voters for a ballot initiative.  The Florida Right to Medical Marijuana Initiative, Amendment 2 is now on the November 4, 2014 ballot in defiance of the federal cannabis prohibition.  

A debate was held about this Florida ballot initiative at the University of Tampa on February 24.  The only physician debater was Eric Voss MD. He is a University of Kansas trained internist from Topeka, who lists his specialty as pain medicine.  He has a long resume indicating he is a medical marijuana opponent.

 Dr. Voss believes:

“The reality of it is that smoked pot is not medicine. There is no other medicine that is smoked out there. And one thing that the marijuana lobby has done is to blur in your mind is the issue of cannabinoids for medical uses and cannabis which is marijuana. Keep in mind we are talking about cannabinoids, which can be identified…which can be synthesized…that can be used as medicine, versus smoked pot.”

  This stems from the propositions that:

  • Isolated cannabinoids will provide more reliable effects than crude plant mixtures
  • Oral administration is better that inhalation.
  • Burning cannabis to volatilize the active components for inhalation produces toxicity

The first of these propositions are unproven.  The fact is the FDA has approved many combination drugs because they are superior or more convenient. Sativex®, an oral spray which is an extract of the cannabis sativa plant, contains THC,  CBD  as well as other  cannabinoids.  It also contains other naturally occurring cannabis-derived terpenoids.  They act synergistically, with the principal cannabinoids- the entourage effect (Br J Pharmacol. 2011 Aug;163(7):1344-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01238.x.).  Sativex® is approved in many countries.    Natural mixtures of cannabinoids have proven to have pharmacological effects not reproduced by a single agent such as dronabinol (THC).  For example animal research shows CBD may mitigate some of the side-effects of THC (Br J Pharmacol. 2013 Dec;170(7):1363-4. doi: 10.1111/bph.12400). 

Inhalation is a route of administration that is approved for many drugs. It has advantages. For example when vomiting prevents oral administration it can provide rapid relief of symptoms. Unlike oral administration, inhalations of volatilized natural mixtures of cannabinoids have a rapid onset of action and may allow titration to the desired drug effect–whether it is pain, spasm or nausea relief.  This is true whether or not the exact concentrations of the cannabinoids in the natural mixture are known. The correct dosage for an individual is based on symptom relief.

Burning cannabis produces multiple toxins similar to cigarette smoke. Generally the medical marijuana user will smoke less than a cigarette smoker. A recent review concludes “Medicinal use of marijuana [smoked] is likely not harmful to lungs in low cumulative doses” (Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2014 Mar;20(2):173-9. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000026). The increasing potency of cannabis today (decried by the prohibitionists as making cannabis more toxic) would be expected to result in less toxicity.  Less smoking of more potent cannabis would produce the same therapeutic effect but less combustion by-products. Super potent cannabis wax would require still less burning.  Better yet are vaporizers.  Cannabinoids will vaporize at temperatures much lower than that required for combustion of plant matter. When heated air is drawn through the cannabis, the active components will aerosolize without the generation of smoke and toxins from combustion.

The smoking route of administration has advantages and disadvantages but does not disqualify cannabis as a medicine. Vaporizers provide a safer alternative to smoking.   Bedrocan is a standardized Cannabis product registered under Dutch law. Bedrocan can be smoked but a vaporizer is recommended.  All varieties are guaranteed free of pesticides and heavy metals. It is also purged of any micro organisms.

Medicinal plants have a long tradition in medicine. In the case of cannabis it may prove to be superior to any single synthesized cannabiniod pharmaceutical.  Numerous drugs fully approved by the FDA have caused  deaths and injuries and many have been taken off the market within months.  Medical cannabis has good safety record with centuries of use.  An additional advantage of cannabis is that it has the capability of  being  produced locally and made available at low cost.

 

Letter from 18 Congressmen to Reschedule Marijuana

 

02-12-14 Blumenauer Rescheduling Letter_Page_102-12-14 Blumenauer Rescheduling Letter_Page_2

02-12-14 Blumenauer Rescheduling Letter_Page_3Pdf of this Letter

Learn About Health Privacy

Like most Americans, you probably believe:

  • What you tell your doctor is totally private
  • If you sign “privacy notices” at a doctor’s office, a pharmacy, a hospital, or a lab, your health records will not be used or disclosed without your permission
  • No one can look at your sensitive health records, prescriptions, or tests without your permission

None of these assumptions are true.

Who Can See and Use your Health Records?

Over 4 million businesses including:

Employers

  • Government agencies
  • Insurance companies
  • Billing firms
  • Pharmaceutical companies
  • Pharmacy benefits managers
  • Marketing firms
  • Data miners

See a sample chart here.

FACT:  Patient consent is no longer required to share health records, no matter how embarrassing or intensely personal the contents may be.  While your doctor may wish to protect your information, once the records are sent out of their offices, they can no longer control who can see or use your information.

Chilling News About Health Privacy:

You Have None.

Is there anything in your health record that you would not want to share with others?  Prescriptions for anti-depressants, anxiety, cancer, long-ago abortions, AIDS or HIV, testing for the Alzheimer gene, your child’s Autism or ADD, sexual impotency prescriptions, hospital admissions, or anything else?

You assume your most personal health information is private, right?   It’s not.

What about Electronic Health Records?

Electronic health records are supposed to be progressive, save lives and money — how can PPR be against progress?

We’re not.   In fact, privacy is the key to progress with Health Information Technology (HIT). The potential benefits of electronic health systems cannot be realized unless Americans have confidence that ironclad privacy protections are in place for online health records, databases, and networks. As Americans realize how open their records actually are, they will avoid treatment and be much more selective about important information they share with their doctors. Patient Privacy Rights applauds the smart use of technology in medicine and the healthcare industry.

Bottom line:  No one should have to choose between privacy and health.

Visit Protect Patient Privacy for more information.